{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5078","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5078,"authors_free":[{"id":5839,"entry_id":5078,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jaan S. Islam","free_first_name":"Jaan S. ","free_last_name":"Islam","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"The Contention between Secular and Revealed Law: Analyzing Ibn Rushd\u2019s Solution to the Problem of the \u201cVirtuous Society\u201d","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The Contention between Secular and Revealed Law: Analyzing Ibn Rushd\u2019s Solution to the Problem of the \u201cVirtuous Society\u201d"},"abstract":"This article is an analysis of the political thought of Ibn Rushd and its significance for the current conflict in Islamic political thought between liberal, secular and conservative Islamist thinkers over the meaning of the \u201cvirtuous society\u201d and how it can be implemented. It is argued that the thought of Ibn Rushd offers a concept of the virtuous society that reconciles secular law and religious Shar\u012b\u2018a law. The article analyzes Ibn Rushd\u2019s Commentary on Plato\u2019s Republic, and assesses it as potentially being able to reconcile the philosophical conflict between logically discerned law and revealed law. It is contended that the separation between \u201creligious\u201d and \u201cpolitical\u201d (i.e., philosophical) domains often attributed to Ibn Rushd does not fully consider the entirety of Ibn Rushd\u2019s writings and interprets his works without regard for their historical and religious contextual significance.","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/10.2979\/jims.4.1.02","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2979\/jims.4.1.02 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":20,"category_name":"Plato","link":"bib?categories[]=Plato"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5078,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies","volume":"4","issue":"1","pages":"43\u201365"}},"sort":["The Contention between Secular and Revealed Law: Analyzing Ibn Rushd\u2019s Solution to the Problem of the \u201cVirtuous Society\u201d"]}

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5476","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5476,"authors_free":[{"id":6350,"entry_id":5476,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ragip Ege","free_first_name":"Ragip","free_last_name":"Ege","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"The concept of \u201clawfulness\u201d in economic matters: reading Ibn Rushd (Averroes)","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The concept of \u201clawfulness\u201d in economic matters: reading Ibn Rushd (Averroes)"},"abstract":"In the Middle Ages the major concept through which economic matters are analysed and evaluated is the \u201clawful\u201d, in Arabic ja\u0302\u2019iz, concept. It claims to establish whether a gain, a profit, a contract is lawful or not: that is the main question theologians examine when they are addressing the issue of appreciating any economic fact. In our study, we analyse the criteria of the \u201clawfulness\u201d as found in the economic parts of Ibn Rushd's work entitled Bida\u0302yat al-mujtahid wa niha\u0302yat al-muqta\u1e63id (English translation: The Distinguished Jurist's Primer). Our thesis is inspired essentially by Raymond De Roover's studies on the economic thought in the Middle Ages. De Roover shows that the criteria for lawfulness are to be found in the nature of the contract between partners: a gain is lawful if the contract which generates it is lawful. Our study essentially consists in a text analysis.","btype":3,"date":"2017","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09672567.2017.1332665","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":82,"category_name":"Economics","link":"bib?categories[]=Economics"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5476,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought","volume":"24","issue":"4","pages":"670-688"}},"sort":["The concept of \u201clawfulness\u201d in economic matters: reading Ibn Rushd (Averroes)"]}

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1554","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1554,"authors_free":[{"id":1783,"entry_id":1554,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1381,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Delfina Serrano Ruano","free_first_name":"Delfina","free_last_name":"Serrano Ruano","norm_person":{"id":1381,"first_name":"Delfina","last_name":"Serrano Ruano","full_name":"Delfina Serrano Ruano","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/5174102","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Delfina Serrano Ruano"}},{"id":1784,"entry_id":1554,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1381,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Delfina Serrano Ruano","free_first_name":"Delfina","free_last_name":"Serrano Ruano","norm_person":{"id":1381,"first_name":"Delfina","last_name":"Serrano Ruano","full_name":"Delfina Serrano Ruano","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/5174102","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Delfina Serrano Ruano"}}],"entry_title":"Why Did the Scholars of al-Andalus Distrust al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b?. Ibn Rushd al-Jadd's Fatw\u0101 on Awliy\u0101' All\u0101h","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Why Did the Scholars of al-Andalus Distrust al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b?. Ibn Rushd al-Jadd's Fatw\u0101 on Awliy\u0101' All\u0101h"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2006","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"}],"authors":[{"id":1381,"full_name":"Delfina Serrano Ruano","role":1},{"id":1381,"full_name":"Delfina Serrano Ruano","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1554,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Der Islam","volume":"83","issue":null,"pages":"137\u2013156"}},"sort":["Why Did the Scholars of al-Andalus Distrust al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b?. Ibn Rushd al-Jadd's Fatw\u0101 on Awliy\u0101' All\u0101h"]}